Recently in web de·vel·op·ment Category

A friend of mine used to drive a right hand drive Alfa Spider. It was a ridiculously impractical car, with all the niggles of old Italian engineering. He had to put his work access card on a stick and lean across the passenger seat to get into the office.

But he loved it. Where others saw niggles, he saw character. Where others saw ridiculous impracticality, he saw the coolest car on the planet. Or at lest that he ever owned.

Which is why I have always said “Buy the car you want, not the one that looks good on paper” †. The problem when you buy a car that ticks all the boxes the decision is too logical. So the pleasure or enjoyment you get out of it is minimised but all the quirks still remain. And those quirks can drive you nutty. But when you buy a car for emotional reasons (which can vary from “It’s red” to “It’s a sexy fast convertible”) you overlook those quirks or rationalise them in character, or simply don’t care.

Ever wonder why most car adverts try engage with people on an emotional rather than practical level? No one really cares about how many cup holders a car has. Note also the shift to things like fuel economy and safety as those issues have become socially and hence emotionally relevant over the recent few years.

Which brings me to Apple. Since the return of Jobs (and doesn’t that sound like biblical passage) Apple has more been engaging with people emotionally. From a design level, from a usability point of view, and from inserting itself into the social zeitgeist. Note the passion of Apple converts. It may be written off in the media as fanboys or fanatics or what not, but it’s a sign of a company building products that engage emotionally, and I can bet that Microsoft or Sony would sacrifice virgin coders to the dark forces if they could get it. Or get it back in Sony’s case. Nintendo has managed this too with the wii.

Of course their are cases where this passion can be counter productive. Some people hate a winner. Starbucks suffer from this a lot in the UK (perhaps elsewhere too). Apple gets a lot of people who resent the ‘hype’ (whatever that is) and don’t like apples products regardless of any logical reasoning. Seen often Daring Fileball as a jackass or being taken down by The Macalope

I had an argument with a friend this week on the iPhone. He “doesn’t buy into Apples hype”. Although he did go through 3 Sony MP3 players before now buying a series of iPods and an iPhone. But because he got the iPhone for logical reasons (best phone on the market) the quirks annoy him. And yeah the iPhone has it’s quirks, and bugs. But no more so than any other phone.

However because he has no emotional attachment to the iPhone (because he doesn’t like the ‘hype’), where he sees an issues with ringtones it’s Apple being crap, and not noticed that it’s the record companies or the fact he had the exact problem with every other phone. Where he sees it as annoying their is no drafts folder for texts, I see the fact that I have email that finally works, where he sees no 3G, I see the best mobile browser on the market.

We both have the same phone. But because I ‘like’ the phone and he doesn’t he sees the problems the phone has and I ignore them. I see the features the phone has, the design, and the general increase in use I have had over all my other phones. He never should have got an iPhone and I advised against it. Because it just frustrates him.

I always think you should buy products that you like.

I always think you should build products that people like. That people emotionally engage with. That people are passionate about. All the best websites do. If you want to be the best make sure you people who are passionate about what you do. If you want people to be passionate about what you do, you better be too.

† This may not be true for all people, or people who could car less about the car, as the fact it’s 4 wheels and box to get you from A to B. However most people I have found who own a car have some degree of passion for it, from Ford Fiestas to hand build Caterham Sevens. People who don’t own cars at all (and/or can’t drive) however often don’t get the car thing at all.

I got my friend Will to start writing a blog for work months ago. What advice did I give him?

  • Write interesting content
  • Be patient, people who like your writing will come
  • Only comment on other peoples blogs if you have something to say that’s meaningful

He’s now loving blogging. Not loving the google juice it gives him. Not loving the SEO aspect. Not loving the marketing. He’s enjoying writing a blog. He’s enjoying writing about work. He’s enjoying expressing himself and having those people who work for him expressing themselves. He’s enjoying talking about his baby (note that’s the flower delivery company, not an actual baby) and that it provides and outlet for him to share some of the energy he is putting into his company.

Which is why I still am amazed when people only see blogs and social sites as a marketing tool.

Take for example this gem I came across (Ironically I think Matt twittered it) of a guide: The Big Juicy Twitter Guide

Part1: Why You Must Start Using Twitter Right Now

… is that it can be an incredibly powerful marketing & community building tool with the ability to develop your brand, build relationships with your audience and provide a promotional medium that has the ability to go viral!

Seriously? SERIOUSLY? You’re kidding me? People still don’t get it. If you’re trying to market with twitter, you just don’t get it. If you’re using twitter as a something to communicate, to be part of an community, to share experiences, that’s all good. If you’re using it as a methodology or process to push marketing messages at customers, you’ve lost it. You don’t get it. You wont get it.

Anyone who tries to make something “go viral” doesn’t get it. Things go viral because they do. Because they are in the right environment at the right time and mostly because the content is good. Better than good, great. But you can’t force viral. Viral happens.

Meg’s anti valentines day sites didn’t go viral because Meg was trying to make a viral. It went viral because Meg was trying to do something she found amusing. It went viral because it was a great idea and a great site. Why was it a great idea and a great site? Because Meg was making something that appealed to her, and hence appealed to other people.

Twitter is now being recognised as a valuable marketing tool …

Oh god. By who. Can’t we have one site that isn’t polluted by people trying to force their message on me. I’ll bet the only people who see Twitter as a valuable marketing tools are the same marketeers that tell you they can make virals.

Part2: How to Get Twitter Followers

When you first join Twitter you will have no followers. You can send updates but the only people likely to see them are the people who are currently surfing the public timeline on the Twitter homepage and that moves pretty fast. You aren’t going to get many followers from there! How then, should you get followers?

This is about as far as I read before I sign off this page seething.

This is bloody ASDFing. This is why I get spammed at least once a week with some dickwad who is following 2367 twitters. I can barely follow the amount of updates I get from somewhere shy of 50. You’re not interested in me, you’re not following me, you’re just trying to get me to follow you.

This is dickheadish behaviour and gets your blocked.

However what really gets my horned quadruped (goat) is that people are still recommending this as a technique.

There is nothing wrong with getting involved in an online community. But if your intention is based around getting people to follow you so you can market to them - Stay out of my internet. You’re not welcome.

When coding goes bad

Nice to see screw ups live on the web. Else there is a level of filth that’s new too me. I’ll bank on it being a screwing code up, as I know most filth.

If you don’t know what I’m talking about

It seems everyone is talking about Facebook at the moment in the blogosphere. I'd link to them, but it's past 10:30p, I've been working 12 hour days, going to the gym at 6:30a and I really want to watch House.

Also I've been meaning to blog this for a while so it's not my fault everyone else is talking about Facebook too this week.

Shortly after I blogged about how Facebook should open their platform, Facebook went and opened their platform. I'd like to say it was all me, except they didn't really listen to me. See I said they should share there their data, and allow people to interact with them.

"This has all happened before, and it will all happen again." (BSG, various)

I remember reading a long time ago in Byte Magazine about the differences between relational and alternative databases. They gave an analogy where they said, you could park a car by driving it home, disassembling it in your drive way and storing each part in neatly catalogued boxes. However the article said, at some point you wake up and realise that whilst you can do this, it's not the ideal way of doing things.

With the release of Google Gears (also see Firefox3 and Slingshot ) everyone is lauding this as the second coming of the web saviour whilst I'm going huh? Seriously?

Twittered

    twittered

    webcam

    moblog

    About this Archive

    This page is a archive of recent entries in the web de·vel·op·ment category.

    tech·nol·o·gy is the previous category.

    work is the next category.

    Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

    unix and linux manuals at manls.com