I find it fairly curious, in an self observational sort of way, that most people view my political stance as fairly liberal leftish or fairly conservative rightish. No one really considers me to have the same viewpoint as them or to be centerish. I don't consider myself to be either.
I try view politics like I view architecture of engineering or something. I try break things down and view them based on what I perceive the particle solutions to be. Obviously this my self perception might be largely out of wack, but I can't really tell. I came into the UK a year after Labour did. I have no baggage about Labour or the Tories based on the past. Where most people here seem to have quite passionate emotional responses to both the parties and their officials. A lot of voting seems based on how much people LIKE the party leader or the party. Less so on how much they agree with or like the party policies.
Again my perception might be incorrect. Their might be scores of people voting based on real issues rather than one issue and how much they like the political leader. But the general trend seems to be everyone votes on
- The War or Taxes
- How much they like/dislike Tony Blair
I think I'm probably the one person in the country, who thinks Tony Blair is actually doing a fairly good job, trying hard and genuinely wants to do good. Yeah he's made mistake, but who hasn't. However he has half the people running around trying to "give Blair a bloody nose" (which is about the most idiotic and immature way to go about voting I can think of), and half the government voting against his policies regardless of whether they agree or not in the policies themselves.
I do find it very hard to defend my position. Against a Tory voter, I get given a list of all the things Labour and Blair have done wrong (and a lot about how much taxes have gone up), and I simply can't explain away each of these issues. I try to point out, that I don't see what a Tory government would have done any better to resolve these issue, and I think real change is both more difficult and takes much longer than anyone thinks. But I can't explain away any of the issues I get listed, and so look a bit foolish.
Against a Labour voter (now normally voting Lib Dem) I get a list of all the things Labour and Blair have done wrong (a lot about the war, and how Blair has let them down) and again, I simply cannot explain away each of these individual issues that gets listed. Again really change is difficult and takes a long time. And I think the broad direction of the government is good and in the right direction. But the list of this and that, I can't argue against and again I look foolish.
I guess I'm politically naive. Or a fool.

1. Col
How foolishly naive.
I am also very difficult to pigeonhole in politics. I like and dislike a little bit of each party and wish politicians would look at the bigger picture and just do some good!
However, saying all that, Blair is the biggest Squirrel Monkey of them all and wants to be a President or even better a dictator. Down with Blair! (not in a funky stylee though)
2. Adrian
My understanding is that British politics moved to be a presidency a while back, and things change and times move on.
I very much doubt that Blair has any inclincation to be a dictator. I think Blair believes very much in democracy, but gets frustrated at times being unable to convince people of his argument or viewpoint. I am the same.
3. Ian
I’m a pretty big Blair supporter. I think that, barring a couple of media-worthy mistakes, he’s done a great job. I think that those things which have needed to be dealt with during his tenure have been dealt with in a timely, and mostly apt manner.
He suffers from the same problems that Thabo Mbeki does. While he more than fulfils his responsibilities in office there are too many people who dislike him because of a) the party he leads, or b) because he once said… or did… such-and-such.
4. annie
“real change is both more difficult and takes much longer than anyone thinks…”
I agree - this includes the politicians as well - if Labour knew they were going to be in power this long they might have done things differently. The party in power tries to push things through as quickly as possible and it leads to badly thought-through decisions.
Blair’s arrogance is pretty insufferable though.
5. Adrian
See I really don’t see Blair’s arrogance. I think it’s perceived to be far greater than it is and so pushed by those who don’t like him.
A President or a Prime Minister (or any leader) is a bit like a football or rugby manager. When the team is winning, he is considered bold and adventurous. When a team is loosing, those same decisions are viewed as arrogance.
6. grumpyoldman
The issue about Blair is he lies.
He Lied about the reasons for going to war with Iraq, and he’s lied since in an attempt to cover this up.
Having said this, one should not be surprised, he is a politician after all.
You can easily tell when a politicans lying…
Their lips move.
7. Adrian
Saying he lied about the reasons for going to war, means that he KNEW their were no Weapons of Mass Destruction, and told the intelligence service to fake the report.
I believe the Hutton Enquiry showed this wasn’t the case. Sure the motivations are far more complex than just one issue, but I do think Blair honestly thought Saddam was a danger, might or did have weapons and that he was doing the right thing.
Saying Blair lied about the war is conjecture and opinion, not fact.
Like I said, the amusing thing about Blair is that when discussing politics I end up defending him to both Labour and Tory voters. And Lib Dem voters. This probably means I’m right about Blair. If you’ve maneged to piss of everybody, normally you’re doing something right.
It’s the ones who try keep everyone happy that scare me.
8. grumpyoldman
If your assumption that pissing people of means your right then Blunket and Prescott are right.
9. Destructor
10. zed
oh blasphemy, blasphemy! sevitz, old chap - blair wants to be the Pope. the only minor problem seems to be the fact that he’s married. with kids.
the man made a mistake, fair enough. he then went on to make another mistake and then another, started lying as a cover-up and is basically up shit-creek without a paddle.
and that’s just about the most you’ll get out of me re: politics.